Skip to content
Sign Up & Get $5 First Order!
Sign Up & Get $5 First Order!
Packman: Logistic Packaging: Which is better? Polymailer with pocket or handle?

Packman: Logistic Packaging: Which is better? Polymailer with pocket or handle?

The choice between a polymailer with a pocket or handle depends on your specific needs and preferences. Here's a breakdown:

  1. Polymailer with Pocket:

    • Pros: A polymailer with a pocket can provide extra space for inserting documents, promotional materials, or small items along with the main package. This can be useful for including invoices, marketing inserts, or any additional information.
    • Cons: Depending on the design and placement of the pocket, it may add bulk to the polymailer, potentially increasing shipping costs. Also, if not securely attached, the pocket could tear or detach during transit.
  2. Polymailer with Handle:

    • Pros: A polymailer with a handle offers convenience for carrying and transporting the package. It can be particularly helpful for items that are bulky or heavy, making it easier for customers to handle their deliveries.
    • Cons: The handle adds extra material and may slightly increase the overall cost of the polymailer. Additionally, if the handle is not securely attached or reinforced, it could tear under the weight of the package or during transit.

Ultimately, the "better" option depends on your priorities. If you prioritize added functionality and the ability to include extra materials, the polymailer with a pocket might be the better choice. However, if convenience and ease of carrying are more important, then the polymailer with a handle might be preferable.

Previous article Packman: Logistic Packaging: Where to store Raffia Shredded Paper?
Next article Packman: Logistic Packaging: Difference between Bubble Wrap & Honeycomb Paper Wrap

Compare products

{"one"=>"Select 2 or 3 items to compare", "other"=>"{{ count }} of 3 items selected"}

Select first item to compare

Select second item to compare

Select third item to compare